Email this article The Role of Illustrations in Popularizing Medical Discourse
Abstract
This article deals with illustrations in popularizing medical discourse. This visual tool can be considered as a strategy of paraphrasing, since popularizing journalists simplify and make information more explicit by using other semiotic information related to the main scientific content. A comparable corpus composed of the online versions of two American, two French and two Italian magazines of science popularization has been analysed. The role of illustrations, as well as their usefulness in terms of comprehension of the text, has been highlighted through a socio-terminological approach (Gaudin 2003). As far as a typological distinction of the illustrations is concerned, a Peircean classification has been adopted (Fisette 2009; Lathene-Da Cunha 2013). A number of observations emerge from the comparison between the magazines, per type and per language: the article shows that, while some illustrations contribute to a better intelligibility of the article’s content, others influence readers’ sensitivity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barthes, Rolland. 1964. “Rhetorique de l’image”. Communications (4): 91-134.
Baldry, Anthony & Paul J. Thibault. 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London and New York: Equinox.
Bontems, Vincent. 2013. “Le role des images des nanotechnologies (a l’interieur et hors du champ scientifique)”. In L’image dans le texte scientifique, edited by David Banks, 103-18. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Calsamiglia, Helena & Teun A. van Dijk. 2004. “Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome”. Discourse & Society 15 (4): 369-89.
Desmet, Isabel. 2005. “Variabilite et variation en terminologie et langues specialisees: discours, textes et contextes”. http://perso.univ-lyon2.fr/~thoiron/JS%20LTT%202005/pdf/Desmet.pdf.
Dondero, Maria Giulia. 2013. “Le rapport entre texte et image dans la litterature de l’astrophysique. Le cas des trous noirs”. In L’image dans le texte scientifique, edited by David Banks, 83-102. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Fisette, Jean. 2004. “L’icone, l’hypoicone et la metaphore. Introduction a quelques elements fondamentaux de la semiotique de Peirce”. In Ateliers de sémiotique visuelle, edited by Anne Henault and Anne Beyaert-Geslin, 101-120. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Focus, www.focus.it (27/10/2015).
Futura-Sciences. www.futurasciences.fr (27/10/2015).
Garzone, Giuliana. 2006. Perspectives on ESP and Popularization. Milan: CUEM.
Gaudin, Francois. 2003. Socioterminologie:Une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. Bruxelles: The Boeck Superieur.
Jacobi, Daniel. 1999. La communication scientifique: discours, figures, modèles. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Jewitt, Carey. 2008. Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leewen. 2006. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
Lathene-Da Cunha, Aurelie. 2013. “L’image de vulgarisation scientifique: essai de typologie”. In L’image dans le texte scientifique, edited by David Banks, 133-52. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Le Scienze. www.lescienze.it (27/10/2015).
Miller, Thomas. 1998. “Visual persuasion: A comparison of visuals in academic texts and the popular press”. English for Specific Purposes (17): 29-46.
Moirand, Sophie. 2005.“De la mediation a la mediatisation des faits scientifiques et techniques: ou en est l’analyse du discours?”. http://sciences-medias.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3?id_article=59.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1978. Écrits sur le signe. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Petroff, Andre Jean. 1984. “Semiologie de la reformulation dans le discours scientifique et technique”. Langue française 64 (1): 53-67.
Sciences et avenir. www.sciencesetavenir.fr (27/10/2015).
ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com (27/10/2015).
Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com (27/10/2015).
Sinclair, John. 1996. “Preliminary recommendations on Corpus Typology”. www.ilc.pi.cnr.it/EAGLES96/corpustyp/corpustype. html.
Van Leewen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
Wu, Shuxuan. 2014. “A Multimodal analysis of Image-Text Relations in Picture Books”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4 (7): 1415-420.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ling-2015-002-sill
Copyright (©) 2015 Linguæ & - Rivista di lingue e culture moderne – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
Linguæ & - Rivista di lingue e culture moderne
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (06/04/2012 n. 185)
Online ISSN 1724-8698 - Print ISSN 2281-8952
Dipartimento di Scienze della Comunicazione, Studi Umanistici e Internazionali: Storia, Culture, Lingue, Letterature, Arti, Media
Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo
Editor-in-Chief: Roberta Mullini
Editorial Board: Maurizio Ascari - Stefano Beretta - Antonio Bertacca- Tania Collani - Chiara Elefante - Marina Guglielmi - Maryline Heck - Richard Hillman - Reinhard Johler - Stephen Knight - Cesare Mascitelli - Sonia Massai - Aurélie Moioli - Maria de Fátima Silva - Bart Van Den Bossche
Editorial Staff: Margaret Amatulli - Alessandra Calanchi - Riccardo Donati - Ivo Klaver - Massimiliano Morini - Antonella Negri - Luca Renzi
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto