Starting from the assumption that new media play a crucial role in circulating discourses about Europe, this paper sets out to compare the representations of the Union circulated by the online press of two member states, Italy and the UK, which have been participating in the European political project to a significantly different extent. Two comparable corpora consisting of texts posted by online newspapers and blogs in Britain and in Italy in the period January 24-26, 2015 on occasion of Greece’s general election have been collected and analyzed. The data obtained thanks to the utilization of a methodological toolkit combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics reveal the presence of common discourses about the possible causes of the electoral outcome in Greece, i.e. the victory of a mildly eurosceptic party, and about the ways in which the Greek political scene can affect that of other member states. Conversely, remarkable differences as to what it means to be part of the European Union emerge in the study: whereas British media discourse considers the EU mainly as an economic reality, their Italian counterparts construct it as a geocultural and political entity.

Anthony, Laurence. 2012. AntConc (Version 3.3.5w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/.

Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London - New York: Continuum.

Baker Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinic, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of the Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press”. Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273-306.

Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1976. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City (NY): Anchor Books.

Davis, Kenneth J., and Keith E. Gergen, eds. 1985. The Social Construction of the Person. New York: Springer.

Delanty, Gerard. 1995. Inventing Europe. Identity, Identity, Reality. Houndmills - Basingstoke - Hampshire - London: MacMillan.

Edwards, Derek. 1991. “Categories Are for Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization”. Theory and Psychology 1 (4): 515-542.

Edwards, Derek. 1994. “Whorf ’s Empty Gasoline Drum and the Pope’s Missing Wife”. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 215-218.

Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London - Beverly Hills (CA): Sage.

Edwards, Derek. 2005. “Discursive Psychology”. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 257-273. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Continuum.

Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli. 2004. “What Can Corpus Linguistics Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?”. In Corpora and Discourse, edited by Alan Partington, John Morlwey, and Louie Haarman, 351-368. Bern: Peter Lang.

Gergen, Keith E. 1991. The Saturated Self, Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.

Gergen, Keith E. 1994. Realities and Relationships, Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1985. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde. 1995. “‘Only Connect’. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics”. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf.

Herrmann, Richard K., Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Marilynn B. Brewer, eds. 2004. Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.

McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa, and Franco Zappettini. 2014. “Networked Identities. Changing Representations of Europeanness”. Critical Discourse Studies 11 (4): 397-415.

Perelman, Chaïm. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London - Newbury Park - Beverly Hills - New Delhi: Sage.

Salvi, Rita. 2014. “Exploring Political and Banking Language for Institutional Purposes”. In Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogical Purposes, edited by Maurizio Gotti and Davide S. Giannoni, 241-261. Bern: Peter Lang.

Salvi, Rita, and Janet Bowker. 2014a. “English for Institutional Purposes in the EU: The Discursive Construal of Argumentation and Ideology”. In Le categorie geografiche di Giorgio Spinelli, a cura di Attilio Celant, Paola Morelli, e Lidia Scarpelli, 480-499. Bologna: Pàtron.

Salvi, Rita, and Janet Bowker. 2014b. “The Construction of Identity in European Settings and the Role of English as an Institutional Lingua Franca”. In Oltre i confini. Studi in onore di Giuseppe Burgio, a cura di Raimondo Cagiano de Azevedo, Claudio Cecchi, Angela Magistro, Giorgio Milanetti, Giuseppe Sancetta, e Donatella Strangio, 171-198. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.

Schotter, John. 1975. Images of Man in Psychological Research. London: Methuen.

Schotter, John. 1984. Social Accountability and Selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.

Triandafyllidou, Anna, Ruth Wodak, and Michal Krzyzanowski, eds. 2009. The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke - New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Dijk, Theun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.

Van Dijk, Theun A. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In The Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schriffin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 352-371. Oxford (MA): Blackwell.

Van Rees, M. Agnes. 2005. “Indicators of Dissociation”. In Argumentation in Practice, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 53-68. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Wodak, Ruth. 2004. “National and Transnational Identities: European and Other Identities Constructed in Interviews with EU Officials”. In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Richard K. Herrmann, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Marilynn B. Brewer, 97-128. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

Wodak, Ruth, and Gilbert Weiss. 2005. “Analyzing European Union Discourses: Theories and Applications”. In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 121-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.