Email this article Sophokles’ Lucky Day: Antigone
Abstract
This article distinguishes five, and then three, mostly political issues raised in Sophokles’ Antigone. (1) Can a traitor to his community be honorably buried? (2) Can a family member be valued ahead of the community? (3) Do underworld gods of the family come before public safety concerns? (4) Can civil authorities rightly be challenged by individual citizens? (5) Can «unwritten ordinances» of the gods supercede the city’s laws? Antigone answers yes to these questions, chiefly because in the 440s Athens’ democratic polity was strengthening at the expense of aristocratic families, but Sophokles was aristocratic, no friend of Perikles, and here sometimes candidly hostile to the masses. (6) What is the significance of Kreon’s degeneration into tyrannical behavior? Sophokles always worried about too powerful magistrates. (7) Haimon’s better behavior reflects Athens’ «generation gap», contrasting older democrats with the more conservative young.
Finally, (8) what is the proper public role of women? While Antigone herself is personally offensive, she proves to be right. As elsewhere, Sophokles rejects Kreon’s and democratic Athens’ harsh treatment of women. The play was successful because Athens’ democratic society itself was changing, especially as regards the status of women.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M.W. Blundell, Helping Friends and Harming Enemies, Cambridge 1989.
A. Connolly, Was Sophocles Heroised as Dexion?, JHS 118 (1998), 1-21.
P. Easterling, Constructing the Heroic, in C. Pelling (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Heroic, Oxford 1997, 21-37.
H. Foley, Tragedy and Democratic Ideology. The Case of Sophocles’ «Antigone», in B. Goff (ed.), History, Tragedy, Theory. Dialogues on Athenian Drama, Austin 1995, 131-150.
W.G. Forrest, An Athenian Generation Gap?, Yale Classical Studies 24 (1975), 38-48.
S. Goldhill, The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology, in J. Winkler - F. Zeitlin (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context, Princeton 1990, 97-129.
M. Griffith, Sophocles Antigone, Cambridge 1999.
E. Keuls, «The Hetaera and the Housewife». The Splitting of the Female Psyche in Greek Art, Meded. Ned. Inst. Rome 44-45 (1983), 23-40.
B. Knox, Oedipus at Thebes, New York 1957.
B. Knox, The Heroic Temper. Studies in Sophoclean Tragedy, Berkeley - Los Angeles 1964.
Ch. Meier, The Political Art of Greek Tragedy, Baltimore 1993.
J. Ober, Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens, Princeton 1989.
R. Osborne, Law, the Democratic Citizen and the Representation of Women in Classical Athens, Past & Present 155 (1997), 3-37.
S. Pomeroy, Goddesses, Whores, Wives and Slaves. Women in Classical Antiquity, New York 1975.
M. Rostovtzeff, A History of the Ancient World, I, The Orient and Greece, London 1930.
C. Sourvinou-Inwood, Assumptions and the Creation of 1989 Meaning: Reading Sophocles’ «Antigone», JHS 109 (1989), 134-148.
R. Sutton, Pornography and Persuasion on Attic Pottery, in A. Richlin (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome, Oxford 1992, 3-35.
R.W. Wallace, Damon of Oa – A Music Theorist Ostracized?, in P. Wilson - P. Murray (eds.), Music and the Muses in Ancient Greece, Oxford 2004, 249-268.
R.W. Wallace Law, Attic Comedy, and the Regulation of Comic Speech, in M. Gagarin - D. Cohen (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Law, Cambridge 2005, 357-373.
R.W. Wallace, «Listening to» the «Archai» in Democratic Athens, in R.W. Wallace - M. Gagarin (hrsgg.), Symposion 2001, Akten der Gesellschaft für Griechische und Hellenistische Rechtsgrschichte, Wien 2005, 147-158.
R.W. Wallace, Law’s Enemies in Ancient Athens, in E. Cantarella - G. Thür (hrsgg.), Symposion 2005, Vorträge zur Griechischen
und Hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Wien 2007, 183-196.
R.W. Wallace, Tecmessa’s Legacy: Valuing Outsiders in Athens’ Democracy, in I. Sluiter - R. Rosen (eds.), Valuing Others in Classical Athens, Leiden - Boston 2010, 137-154.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2013-001-wall
Copyright (©) 2014 Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
Announcements
Erga/Logoi accepts books for review
The books are to be sent to the Executive Editor
Call for papers Vol. 14 (2026)
Authors have to read through the Information for Authors and the Author guidelines carefully before beginning the submission process.
Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (20/09/2012 n. 353)
Online ISSN 2282-3212 - Print ISSN 2280-9678
Executive Editor: Cinzia Bearzot
Editorial Staff: Paolo A. Tuci (Coordinator) - Marcello Bertoli - Livia De Martinis - Laura Loddo - Annabella Oranges - Alessandra Valentini
Editorial Board: Gaetano Arena - Ralf Behrwald - Margherita Cassia - Paolo Cesaretti - Bernard Eck - Michele Faraguna - Massimo Gioseffi - Dominique Lenfant - Lauretta Maganzani - Roberto Nicolai - Giovanni Parmeggiani - Marina Polito - Umberto Roberto - Francesca Rohr - Marco Sannazaro - Stefan Schorn - Paolo A. Tuci - Gianpaolo Urso - José Vela Tejada - Robert Wallace
Emeritus Editorial Board: Serena Bianchetti - Giovannella Cresci - Lia Raffaella Cresci - Ugo Fantasia - Franca Landucci - Rosalia Marino - Riccardo Vattuone
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto